cstr/darwin-tts-1.7b-cross-GGUF
2B • Updated • 146 • 3
Warecube Korea
Warecube
AI & ML interests
None yet
Recent Activity
liked a model about 7 hours ago
cstr/darwin-tts-1.7b-cross-GGUF liked a model about 7 hours ago
mradermacher/Darwin-27B-Opus-GGUF liked a model about 7 hours ago
mradermacher/Darwin-27B-Opus-i1-GGUFOrganizations
None yet
liked 3
models about 7 hours ago
upvoted an article about 11 hours ago
Article
FINAL-Bench Quantum: An Open, Neutral Benchmark for Quantum-Computing Methods
FINAL-Bench
• • 15 liked a
Space about 11 hours ago
reacted to SeaWolf-AI's post with 🔥 about 11 hours ago
Post
1951
🚀 Introducing FINAL-Bench Quantum — an open, neutral benchmark that finally puts quantum-computing methods on one fair yardstick.
Quantum results are notoriously hard to compare. The same "logical error rate" or "query fidelity" means very different things depending on the code, noise model, hardware, and shot count. FINAL-Bench Quantum fixes that: five events judged under identical, published protocols, where every number is labeled as either measured here or quoted from a source.
Five events: ① QEC Decoder ② Optimization (Max-Cut) ③ VQE ④ QRAM ⑤ Quantum Simulation
The rules are simple and strict:
✅ Track A (measured here, with 95% confidence intervals) is kept separate from Track B (quoted from papers, not directly comparable).
🔬 Simulation and real hardware are clearly distinguished, and no quantum-advantage claims are made.
🌍 Methods from Google, IBM, NVIDIA, USTC, Riverlane and more sit side by side, with origin flags and author credits.
📤 Anyone can submit their own method via the Submit tab for review and listing.
Already on the board: real IBM Heron r2 measurements (repetition-code distance boundary, 29–175× error reduction from d3 to d5), a real-chip QRAM query fidelity of 0.92, and H₂ VQE at chemical accuracy — always labeled honestly as simulation vs hardware.
A leaderboard is only useful if you can trust it, so neutrality is the whole point: strong competitors stay in even when they beat the host, sources are quoted faithfully, and a simulation is never rounded up into a hardware claim.
Leaderboard: FINAL-Bench/quantum-bench-leaderboard
Article: https://huggingface.co/blog/FINAL-Bench/quantum-leaderboard
#quantum #QEC #QuantumComputing #benchmark
Quantum results are notoriously hard to compare. The same "logical error rate" or "query fidelity" means very different things depending on the code, noise model, hardware, and shot count. FINAL-Bench Quantum fixes that: five events judged under identical, published protocols, where every number is labeled as either measured here or quoted from a source.
Five events: ① QEC Decoder ② Optimization (Max-Cut) ③ VQE ④ QRAM ⑤ Quantum Simulation
The rules are simple and strict:
✅ Track A (measured here, with 95% confidence intervals) is kept separate from Track B (quoted from papers, not directly comparable).
🔬 Simulation and real hardware are clearly distinguished, and no quantum-advantage claims are made.
🌍 Methods from Google, IBM, NVIDIA, USTC, Riverlane and more sit side by side, with origin flags and author credits.
📤 Anyone can submit their own method via the Submit tab for review and listing.
Already on the board: real IBM Heron r2 measurements (repetition-code distance boundary, 29–175× error reduction from d3 to d5), a real-chip QRAM query fidelity of 0.92, and H₂ VQE at chemical accuracy — always labeled honestly as simulation vs hardware.
A leaderboard is only useful if you can trust it, so neutrality is the whole point: strong competitors stay in even when they beat the host, sources are quoted faithfully, and a simulation is never rounded up into a hardware claim.
Leaderboard: FINAL-Bench/quantum-bench-leaderboard
Article: https://huggingface.co/blog/FINAL-Bench/quantum-leaderboard
#quantum #QEC #QuantumComputing #benchmark
- 1 reply
liked a
model 1 day ago
liked a
model 6 days ago
updated a
model 6 days ago
liked a
model 7 days ago
liked a
model 12 days ago
liked a
dataset 14 days ago
liked 8
models 17 days ago
haffner/Darwin-4B-Genesis-heretic-GGUF
7B • Updated • 3.88k • 9
mradermacher/Darwin-28B-Coder-i1-GGUF
27B • Updated • 2.27k • 7
zeropointnine/Darwin-TTS-1.7B-Cross-Qwen3Tokenizer
Text-to-Speech • 2B • Updated • 70 • 5
FlatFootInternational/Darwin-9B-NEG-mlx-fp16
Text Generation • 9B • Updated • 137 • 5
tomasmcm/Darwin-4B-Genesis-mlx-4Bit
Text Generation • 1B • Updated • 95 • 5
k0valik/Darwin-28B-Coder-IQ4_XS12.9GiB-GGUF
Text Generation • 27B • Updated • 771 • 6
hiiamboris/Darwin-28B-Coder-Q4_K_M-GGUF
Text Generation • 27B • Updated • 369 • 6
SeaWolf-AI/Darwin-gemma-4-E4B-it-x-Gemma-4-E4B-Claude-4-08292
Updated • 7