Abstract
Video-Oasis diagnostics reveal that half of existing video benchmarks can be solved without visual input, exposing significant capability gaps in current video understanding models.
The inherent complexity of video understanding makes it difficult to determine whether Video-LLM benchmark performance stems from visual perception, linguistic reasoning, or knowledge priors. While many benchmarks have emerged to assess high-level reasoning, shared criteria for evaluating video understanding remain largely overlooked. Instead of introducing yet another benchmark, we take a step back to re-examine the criteria for evaluating video understanding. In this work, we introduce Video-Oasis, a sustainable diagnostic suite for systematically auditing existing video understanding benchmarks. This audit reveals that 55\% of existing benchmark samples are solvable without visual input or temporal context. After filtering these shortcuts, the remaining video-native challenges expose a substantial capability gap: state-of-the-art models perform only marginally above random guessing. Building on these findings, we use the distilled challenges as a testbed to investigate which algorithmic design choices contribute to robust video understanding. We hope our work provides a practical foundation for constructing rigorous video benchmarks and evaluating future Video-LLMs. Code is available at https://github.com/sejong-rcv/Video-Oasis.
Community
TL;DR. Video-Oasis rethinks the current benchmark landscape by examining whether proliferating video benchmarks truly satisfy shared criteria for genuine video understanding.
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- VideoSeeker: Incentivizing Instance-level Video Understanding via Native Agentic Tool Invocation (2026)
- LongVQUBench: Benchmarking Long-Term Video Quality Understanding of Vision-Language Models (2026)
- EG-VQA: Benchmarking Verifiable Video Question Answering with Grounded Temporal Evidence (2026)
- Artifact-Bench: Evaluating MLLMs on Detecting and Assessing the Artifacts of AI-Generated Videos (2026)
- FineBench: Benchmarking and Enhancing Vision-Language Models for Fine-grained Human Activity Understanding (2026)
- No Place to Hide: Benchmarking Video Hallucination with Background-Controlled Pairs (2026)
- ViTexQA: A Multi-Frame Temporal Perception Dataset for Video Text Question Answering (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2603.29616 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper